Individuals with no aspiration of being perfect are content with being imperfect. They are complacent with being flawed. Even Christians will argue an erroneous idea that "no one is perfect but God". They embrace such ideals because they lack the willingness to change.
For most, change is something that is severe and drastic. They have become too comfortable in their ways; improvement and reform is out of the question. But is change sinister? Is there anything evil with striving to be perfect? Is the Judeo-Christian god the only person that has achieved perfection?
No, there isn't anything evil with change or being perfect. More importantly, any Christian that is under the illusion that no one can be perfect but the sky god Jehovah, needs to read Biblical literature more thoroughly; Biblical literature documents several of its characters as being perfect (i.e., Abraham, Issaac, Jacob, Job, and Methuselah).
In any event, why would anyone want to be flawed? Why would anyone not strive to be something better? Why do people oppose change? It is not evil to change for the better, but evil to remain the same and not change for the better.
In other words, if there's a chance to become a positive person, why would you want to remain a negative person? If there's a chance to fix what's wrong, why wouldn't a person do so? Is that not evil?
Marcus Aurelius Antoninus asserted, "It is no evil for things to undergo change, and no good for things to subsist in consequence of change." As a rational and ethical person, can you honestly convince either of us that there is something insidious with eliminating the errors within us and becoming perfect? Even if we don't reach perfection, at least try.
One can be flawed and have the willingness to improve; that is godly; however, it is devilish to know that you are flawed and not do anything about it. The Perfect Being is something that we are destined to be; there is something divine in all of us. Search out that divinity and become it.
For most, change is something that is severe and drastic. They have become too comfortable in their ways; improvement and reform is out of the question. But is change sinister? Is there anything evil with striving to be perfect? Is the Judeo-Christian god the only person that has achieved perfection?
No, there isn't anything evil with change or being perfect. More importantly, any Christian that is under the illusion that no one can be perfect but the sky god Jehovah, needs to read Biblical literature more thoroughly; Biblical literature documents several of its characters as being perfect (i.e., Abraham, Issaac, Jacob, Job, and Methuselah).
In any event, why would anyone want to be flawed? Why would anyone not strive to be something better? Why do people oppose change? It is not evil to change for the better, but evil to remain the same and not change for the better.
In other words, if there's a chance to become a positive person, why would you want to remain a negative person? If there's a chance to fix what's wrong, why wouldn't a person do so? Is that not evil?
Marcus Aurelius Antoninus asserted, "It is no evil for things to undergo change, and no good for things to subsist in consequence of change." As a rational and ethical person, can you honestly convince either of us that there is something insidious with eliminating the errors within us and becoming perfect? Even if we don't reach perfection, at least try.
One can be flawed and have the willingness to improve; that is godly; however, it is devilish to know that you are flawed and not do anything about it. The Perfect Being is something that we are destined to be; there is something divine in all of us. Search out that divinity and become it.
